Gospel believers cannot be said to be Antinomians no matter how one spends it.

Since I received your unexpected letter, my thoughts have been led upon various accounts diligently to enquire wherein the radical difference between us lies. As for those charges frequently alleged against the Doctrine I preach, that it is Antinomian, derogatory from the work of the spirit, destroys the comfort of believers, and sets aside the use of exhortations both to believers and unbelievers, &c. These are particulars too BAD to be easily credited by those who know my general character and principles. And when such things as these are objected to me, I feel or am intimately conscious that the sentiments I espouse are not in the least degree chargeable with any such consequences. Every one that rightly understands them will presently perceive, that they cannot be Antinomian, because the truth appears to be of such a nature, that a person who believes can have no enjoyment of himself, but in loving and obeying it from the heart according to the precepts of the gospel. They cannot be said to derogate from the spirit' work, because 'tis all along aver'd that the gospel can take no saving effect but by the necessary, efficacious Almighty and sovereign agency of the divine Spirit. Neither do they destroy the comforts of a believer, because they continually present to him a compleat and free Saviour, for his immediate relief, and assert that the Spirit of God witnesses to the genuine effects of the gospel appearing in his experience and conduct. - Samuel Pike, Free grace indeed! Set forth in a Scriptural view of the principle of grace wrought in the heart by the Spirit, pg. 2