Bart Ehrman's arguments are nothing

Bart Ehrman is known for his anti-biblical attacks against Christianity. There are many who 'respond' according to his level of expertise. However, only those who do not believe that the Bible alone is the word of God will attempt to discredit it as the sole infallible and authoritative word that it is. What is Bart Ehrman really saying? He isn't saying that we have no autograph copies of the ancient writings. No. He is saying that he does not believe the Bible and therefore does not believe God. If one believes that the Bible alone is the word of God then where is the argument against such notions? Only the skeptic and the evidentialist will run in circles trying to prove what they cannot adequately prove.