Wednesday, March 26, 2014

On God, Man, Sin, and Responsibility

 "God is neither responsible nor sinful, even though he is the only ultimate cause of everything. he is not sinful because in the first place whatever God does is just and right. It is just and right simply in virtue of the fact that he does it. Justice or righteousness is not a standard eternal to God to which God is obligated to submit. Righteousness is what God does. Since God caused Judas to betray Christ, this causal act is righteous and not sinful. By definition God cannot sin. At this point it must be particularly pointed out that God's causing a man to sin is not sin. There is no law, superior to God, which forbids him to decree sinful acts. Sin presupposes a law, for sin is lawlessness. Sin is any want of conformity unto or transgression of the law of God. But God is 'Ex-lex'."

"True it is that if a man, a created being, should cause or try to cause another man to sin, this attempt would be sinful. The reason is plain. The relation of one man to another is entirely different from the relation of God to any man. God is the creator; man is a creature. And the relation of a man to the law is equally different from the relation of God to the law. What holds in the one situation does not hold in the other. God has absolute and unlimited rights over all created things. Of the same lump he can make one vessel for honor and another for dishonor. The clay has no claims on the potter. Among men, on the contrary, rights are limited."

"The idea that God is above law can be explained in another particular. The laws that God imposes on men do not apply to the divine nature. They are applicable only to human conditions. For example, God cannot steal, not only because whatever he does is right, but also because he owns everything; There is no one to steal from. Thus the law that defines sin envisages human conditions and has no relevance to a sovereign Creator."

Gordon H. Clark, Three R's

1 comment:

Anonymous said...

Amen.

Another way to demonstrate that God is Ex-Lex is by pointing out that God's laws are mutable and change according to the times according to what God commands for a particular time. But God's nature is immutable.

So If God is immutable, yet his laws are mutable, God's nature cannot be synonymous with the law. God therefore, has to be Ex-Lex. The law, while not contradicting the nature of God, is mutable because creation is mutable, and God has specific commands for his creation at different times.

Thus, we say that "the law flows from the nature of God" rather than "the nature of God flows from the law". By this definition, God is necessarily Ex-Lex -- outside the law and not under it.